<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tradegy at the Box-office</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dorsser.com/2009/07/13/tradegy-at-the-box-office/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dorsser.com/2009/07/13/tradegy-at-the-box-office/</link>
	<description>www.dorsser.com - Bookmark or subscribe if you like The Dorsser</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 05:47:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jt</title>
		<link>http://dorsser.com/2009/07/13/tradegy-at-the-box-office/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dorsser.com/?p=284#comment-116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m leaving you on your own for the US remake... I do not want to be blamed for any more collateral promotion. Damage control, you see.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m leaving you on your own for the US remake&#8230; I do not want to be blamed for any more collateral promotion. Damage control, you see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://dorsser.com/2009/07/13/tradegy-at-the-box-office/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dorsser.com/?p=284#comment-115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hum. We both use the same construction of opinions here.

You are just saying that we shouldn&#039;t go and see this movie because it is not good and you didn&#039;t like it, proof being that 2 persons set a bad score on IMDB.  So I didn&#039;t want to argue with an inappropriate tone or a too thick argumentation.

And I would say that mine is more solid:  Sophie Marceau is in deed very beautiful.

Do you know when the american movie is issued?  I already missed Lol, I wouldn&#039;t miss its remake...

LOL !!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hum. We both use the same construction of opinions here.</p>
<p>You are just saying that we shouldn&#8217;t go and see this movie because it is not good and you didn&#8217;t like it, proof being that 2 persons set a bad score on IMDB.  So I didn&#8217;t want to argue with an inappropriate tone or a too thick argumentation.</p>
<p>And I would say that mine is more solid:  Sophie Marceau is in deed very beautiful.</p>
<p>Do you know when the american movie is issued?  I already missed Lol, I wouldn&#8217;t miss its remake&#8230;</p>
<p>LOL !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jt</title>
		<link>http://dorsser.com/2009/07/13/tradegy-at-the-box-office/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dorsser.com/?p=284#comment-109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was arguing against the merits of commercial success as a measure of quality... and you appeal to a prejudice of &quot;most French people&quot; to counter it? You&#039;re not making life any easier.

So if the movie was not with the beautiful Sophie Marceau but with the scary Demi Moore, would the film still hold any value? I take it we both think it would hold even less interest... but, wait for this one... the Americans are making their remake with her...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was arguing against the merits of commercial success as a measure of quality&#8230; and you appeal to a prejudice of &#8220;most French people&#8221; to counter it? You&#8217;re not making life any easier.</p>
<p>So if the movie was not with the beautiful Sophie Marceau but with the scary Demi Moore, would the film still hold any value? I take it we both think it would hold even less interest&#8230; but, wait for this one&#8230; the Americans are making their remake with her&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://dorsser.com/2009/07/13/tradegy-at-the-box-office/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 07:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dorsser.com/?p=284#comment-100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven&#039;t seen the movie but I know people who has and really enjoyed it.

There is something terribly, absolutely, frackly, undubatebly, evidently, whateverotherwordly FALSE in your article.

You are in fact missing the basic axiom of most french people : a film with Sophie Marceau cannot be a bad movie. Even if you have to bring earballs in the movie theater. 

Cheers,
Joel]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t seen the movie but I know people who has and really enjoyed it.</p>
<p>There is something terribly, absolutely, frackly, undubatebly, evidently, whateverotherwordly FALSE in your article.</p>
<p>You are in fact missing the basic axiom of most french people : a film with Sophie Marceau cannot be a bad movie. Even if you have to bring earballs in the movie theater. </p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Joel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

