How long do we have to wait this time?

May 27, 2009

cannes2009Cannes Film Festival / UGC Cinemas :: France :: 2009

After the Champagne sipping, backslapping and air kissing is all over on the picturesque Mediterranean and the film producers, sellers, models, journalists, actors, and wannabes have all returned to their respective polluted metropolises, the audience is once again left in bewilderment. Surely this is all about us in some way or another? When do we get to see Haneke’s masterpiece?

Cinema loving France, including yours truly, is feeling the chill once again. UGC,  Europe’s largest cinema operator, announced that the winner of the 62nd Festival de Cannes, The White Ribbon, will be screened as of the 21st October 2009. In case you missed that, that is in five months time! This may be slightly faster than after previous festivals (remember l’Enfant?) but seriously, is that the best they can do? All the buzz of the moment will be distant whispers by the time the audience gets back from a long hot summer. Every year has a winner, surely some planning is possible?

One of the beauties of cinema is its power to share- a million copies of the same film can be made and watched all around the world at the same time. We live in a digital era where if a member of the public gets their hands on a copy, it can be distributed through an internet peer to peer system and be available worldwide instantly. The professional bodies of film producers, distributors and buyers are nowhere near such efficiency. They need to learn a lesson from the world’s teenagers to get their distribution in order. Reading raving reviews of new film is exciting, but considerably less so if you are left outside staring at the poster.

UGC, Allociné, Festival de Cannes


Are hotels hospitable?

May 19, 2009

DSC04283

London Euston Premier Inn :: Hotel :: 1 Dukes Road, London, WC1H  9PJ, UK :: 17 May 2009

The most common response would be people telling you that it depends on the hotel. This is of course true, as we have all stayed in charming hotels and have our favorites somewhere. But for those who have jobs, and depending largely on your line of work, will also have been confronted with business hotels. The concept is fairly simple: a standard design, spacious,  meeting rooms, conveniently located and perhaps most importantly, with a lot of rooms. Business travelers are not flexible, time wise, and need a room on the day they specify. They do not, on the other hand, mind a view of a busy boulevard, nor do they mind over-paying for the room (as it is not their bank account). Last night, I stayed in the UK’s biggest hotel chain, Premier Inn, with 500 hotels across the country! Although it has four stars, it is a simple but large hotel hoping to capture not only those business people but also travelling families. It is relatively cheap by business hotel standards (expect a little over €100 a night). But take a look at what you really get for that amount. Let us run through the experience.

As you can see from the opening image, the outer design is atrocious, a cross between a hospital and a temporary construction site office. On entry, you will notice that the insides are designed to scare away any self respecting youngster or romantic, accentuated with monochrome purple. This is an aesthetic selection at the Premier Inn door to weed out the trouble makers – after all, which self respecting youngster would want to be seen in such an office environment?

The guest, if he stays, has to first comply with the police state rules – name, identification number, address, show papers and hand over money. The Mr and Ms Smith hotel freedom era can not take place in such a corporate glass brick institution. Naturally, as with almost all “security” measures, if you do not want to be registered, you only have to check into one of the more dodgy hotels around the station, and there is no lack of those. State security rationale seems to dictate that terrorists and the likes can spend the night in hotels, but only if it is grotty with stained sheets and costs less than 50€. In their dusty lobby you will still be welcomed as Mr and Mrs Smith… but comfort, even at a low level, is reserved for non-terrorists only.

P1020671

Up to the room, armed with the keycard. Swipe a machine to open the elevator doors (impenetrable security!), floor 5 please. At the right room number, push the keycard into the slot and pull it out quickly. Instantaneously, anyone in the corridor will have distinguished the experienced traveller from the debutant as you do or do not hear the door open with a click. Hopefully unembarrassed, you can walk into a spacious environment which is now temporarily your home. A normal hotel room in 2009. I made myself a coffee, took a sip and as my eyes opened up to the purple reality around me, I saw the usual little green milk capsule with the curious inscription “Tastes like fresh milk”. But think about that for a second. That, of course, is another way of saying “this is not fresh milk but you will not notice”. Hardly reassuring. Basically, they think I am willing to kid myself into believing I am enjoying some milk in my coffee while I am actually drinking something else, something fake. And I do not know what…

P1020669I took off my coat and to my great surprise the coat hangers were placed so low that even an adult shirt could not hang there! This is absurd! They could mark the cupboard on their list as being there, but it can’t be used! I wanted to put my wallet in the safe, but this one was not free… the hotel was telling me that their staff is not necessarily trustworthy, nor are their locks, but if you get robbed it was your own fault for not having paid the extra for the safe… What kind of a world have I landed into?

On to the bathroom – there is no shower. You have to balance in the bathtub to take a shower, if you want one. This is a common feature of both hotels and apartments today, but should this not be questioned? To get in and out of the shower is very uncomfortable and dangerous for many old people. Once you are inside, if you remain standing up, there is no space to turn and your feet are on the slanted slopes of the bath tub. The hotel is aware of the discomfort and risk of falling, but instead of installing normal showers to solve the problem, they added support bars all around the tub to make you feel like an invalid. That way, like with the safe and the coat hangers, it is your fault (now for being clumsy or old) rather than theirs. This is typical big-company rationale – rather than solving a problem, you spend more to circumvent it but leaving it in place.

P1020664But if the discomfort had not hit you completely yet, try washing your hands: there is a separate faucet for the hot and cold. Again, this is common, but why do we not just admit that this is grossly outdated. Either you burn your hands under the hot tap or freeze them under the cold. If the hotel wants to insist on an 18th century experience, then the basin has to be deeper and narrower and easy to close so that people can actually wash their hands in it. Perhaps having a porcelain jug next to the sink which you can fill up like it is the French revolution might help as well. Again, it is you who is made to feel bad for ignorantly not using the sink as it was intended and hence freezing/ burning your hands rather than them just simply solving the problem (or not creating it in the first place).

On the surface of things, Premier Inn, or other similar simple hotels, offer a room as hotels have always done. But it is remarkable how little comfort such a 4 star hotel really provides. And remember that there are 500 of these in the UK and this is a recent building. These discomforts are no coincidence. It is equally remarkable to notice that it seems almost engineered to be uncomfortable and to make you feel bad. But why do they do it? Complaining about any of these elements is petty because they are so common, but you could also expect a chain to try to innovate at least a little bit themselves. Of course I would have written this all last night, but, unsurprisingly, the hotel did not offer Wifi…

www.premierinn.com

P1020668


Blueprint for a new Paris

May 12, 2009

Grand Paris

Grand Paris :: exposition :: Cité de l’architecture et du patrimoine :: 29 April 2009 – 22 November 2009

In the ever urbanizing world post-Kyoto, cities face the challenge of creating an ecologically balanced, pleasant and efficient metropolis for future generations. In June 2007, the French president Nicolas Sarkozy commissioned 10 architect and urban planning agencies to propose a vision for Paris 2030. These projects are now presented to the public at the Cité de l’architecture et du patrimoine under the name Grand Pari(s).

What you can see

The exposition does not do justice to neither the excitement and magnitude of the project nor to the elabourate work which was put into it. The 10 agencies all present themselves using multi-media technology in booths too small to cater for the affluence, and their presentations are too brief to be seriously contemplated. There is, however, an excellent exposition overview book to compensate (see below).

Who was commissioned

Six French architects including Jean Nouvel, Yves Lion, Christian de Portzamparc, Antoine Grumbach, Roland Castro and l’AUC, plus the Dutch practice MVRDV, Germany’s LIN, the UK’s RSH+P and Italy’s Studio 09.

What you can read

There are quite a few options, but the best introduction is surely the  exposition’s overview book, Le Grand Pari(s). It is available in the museum bookshop for 29€ and covers the 10 different projects with the agencies’ own words and with plenty of images to bring it to life. It is prefaced by president Sarkozy, who explains the need for not only new urban planning but also for administrative reform for the Paris region, and the challenges of the Kyoto protocol.

What is going to happen

The different projects should not really be seen as a competition, as with large prestigious public buildings,President Sarkozy has ear-marked 35 billion euros initially for the development of the capital. Presumably, the vision of Antoine Grumbach, with the city of Paris following the Seine to Le Havre, will be developed with priority. Also, presumably 20 billion euros will be invested into the 140 km long new fully automatic metro line which is to circle the city linking new developments and the airports.

Critiques

Several British newspapers criticized the entire project in times of recession and social upheaval. It is worth remembering that the project was launched in a pre-recession 2007. But even besides that, the timing is not inappropriate, as the most common anti-financial crisis measures taken by countries has been mass investment into the economy. Public works is a long term investment which equates, in this case, to a projected 35 billion euros investment over the coming years. Improving infrastructure and the attractiveness of the city are worthy destinations for the capital injection, especially considering that they are destined to create jobs and activity in the troubled suburbs. A recent poll by the newspaper Le Parisien amongst the residents gave a staggering 70% approval rating to the project as an economic booster.

From the general public, voices have been heard worrying about the destruction of a beautiful city. These people should not overly worry, the project will not create a highway cutting trough Ille Saint Louis. The French capital is one of the most visited cities in the world and loved by its inhabitants. The project is intended to re-shape the city (12 million people) by improving the interaction with the suburbs, through remodeling, improving transport, changing the political structure, reshuffling economic and administrative focal points. The general idea would be to integrate the suburbs with the city, as to make a greater whole of the parts. And that, in an ecologically and aesthetically sound package.

NB More about the projects will follow, right here.


Nouvelles Mythologies

May 5, 2009

mythologiesNouvelles Mythologies :: ed Jérôme Garcin :: Seuil :: France :: 2007

Originally a column in the weekly Nouvelle Observateur magazine, the book groups together 57 articles  on vasty diverging topics. Each writer uncovers signs, finds meaning, like a contemporary Roland Barthes, in society as it presents itself to us today. Nostalgics of Barthes’ original Mythologies series will find the Smart, Google, the Euro, the 4WD and the Polish plumber discussed here with poise and lyricism.

Naturally, not every article has the same power, just like not every subject captures your imagination, but the editor has managed to create a feeling of whole, a blend, which gives the ensemble a specific flavour. It encourages you to view the world with the eyes of a child and the mind of a poet. It helps to know France somewhat, but if you do not, the book could also be considered as an escapade into the psyche of the contemporary man, even if the views are not always universally shared.

What is perhaps surprising, is that although the book is not even two years old, many articles already seem dated. A cynical article about the merits of speed dating seems a world away since online dating websites, such as Meetic, have now been stock quoted for several years. And the death of prose with the onslaught on mobile text messaging sounds overly pessimistic when most people now think the popularity of email has saved writing from a death by telephone. And a beautiful article about the silent photo consumer icon Kate Moss which depends on her silence… but it is not true – she is not silent. At least not anymore. It is there that we notice the difference between an article in a magazine and a book, where the former can reside unabashed in the present, the latter has the pretension to span through time. After all, we would not bundle daily stock quotes or celebrity gossip into books to arrange them between our collected works of Dickens and the Lonely Planet.

But not all the articles are time-stamped like bananas on a kitchen counter. As we are taken to an article about the Nespresso capsule, we are confronted with a remarkable marketing analysis, with the capsule as the emblem of right wing economics. The analysis of the nicotine patch is touching, with the author laying a parallel between the poison which bonds us together in happiness and the solitary sadness of the requirements of health to wash it away again. And the effect of the 2006 purchase of the European steel giant Arcelor by the Indian heavy-weight Mittal on the French psyche, as a confrontation of the history of industrial France with the globalized economy.

The articles are as varied as they are insightful and funny. When Frédèric Beigbeder writes about the GPS, he notes: “Every time someone switches on his mobile phone or his GPS, he can no longer hide: we can send him missiles, the police, or his wife.” Of course we should ask him who the “we” is that he thinks can read his GPS, but the joke remains for the consciously paranoid. Or when Jacqueline Remy dryly describes the development in women’s handbags: ”Its size has grown with women’s rights. Sometimes it’s heavy.” There is much to think along with and much to laugh about in this eclectic study of the world around us. A world so close it is often overlooked. Do not miss out.

NB Translations are my own.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.